I love discussing theology. I suppose it’s about time I join the blogosphere in the discussion of Rob Bell’s new book, Love Wins.
Let me start by making a few things clear:
1. I’m not very familiar with Rob Bell. All I really know about him is that he’s a pastor and encourages people to ask tough questions. After watching a few of the “nooma” videos he’s produced, I get the idea he’s more about asking the questions then answering them.
2. I align myself with the Reformed interpretation of scripture. This means that I believe the Bible is inerrant, and these core facets are 100% true: Every person has sinned and falls short of the glory of God. The wages of sin is death, meaning separation from God. Jesus Christ, fully God and fully man, lived a sinless life, died, and descended into Hell on my behalf. His death paid my penalty for my sin. His resurrection and ascension defeated death, and likewise my soul will live forever in Heaven. Although I believe, my belief is not what has saved me from Hell. Although I now strive to do good, it is not my good works that have saved me from Hell. It is Christ’s death alone, and his specific and personal desire to do a work in my heart that has saved me, and caused me to believe.
3. I believe wholeheartedly that Love (God) wins, and indeed has already won. My belief comes not from a book that any man has written, but from the only book that is 100% true: the Holy Bible. And this will be the source that Love Wins will be up against.
4. When I discuss theological topics, I try to think with an open mind. I do my best to remember that God is God, and my ideas about what I think are “good” may not align with what is actually good according to God. God’s mind is infinite, mine is finite. God is sovereign, I am…not. So I encourage anyone exploring deep topics like these to try not to put God in a box, and have faith that the Bible is God’s true and living word.
So, let’s start with the preface.
I have to commend Mr. Bell for his boldness. He must have known that this book would stir the masses into discussion; after all he states clearly that was his goal: “If this book, then, does nothing more than introduce you to the ancient, ongoing discussion surrounding the resurrected Jesus in all its vibrant, diverse, messy, multivoiced complexity – well, I’d be thrilled,” (Bell, viii). The book has made headlines everywhere. Why? Because everyone ponders eternity.
Something else he makes clear right away is his belief that “the love of God is for every single one of us…for everybody, everywhere.” From a reformed perspective, I have to agree. God’s love can be seen upon every individual on this earth. I have a feeling the reason for my belief in this truth will differ from Mr. Bell’s, but I have yet to discover that. I believe in something called “common grace.” Let me explain. Since every person has sinned, every person deserves death. Not everyone is dead, in fact, people are born every day. How can this be? If every one deserves death but isn’t dead, God must love everyone enough to let them live their short life on earth. In this common grace, we see God’s love poured out on every living soul. So far so good, Rob.
He then begins to address the reason he wrote the book. He speaks of different stories of Christ that have “hijacked” the lost plot of the true story, that must be “reclaimed” (Bell, viii). He identifies with the many people who have found “some version of the Jesus story” uncomfortable, or unacceptable (Bell, viii). And then he states the following:
A staggering number of people have been taught that a select few Christians will spend forever in a peaceful, joyous place called heaven, while the rest of humanity spends forever in torment and punishment in hell with no chance for anything better. It’s been clearly communicated to many that this belief is a central truth of the Christian faith and to reject it is, in essence, to reject Jesus. This is misguided and toxic and ultimately subverts the contagious spread of Jesus’s message of love, peace, forgiveness, and joy that our world desperately needs to hear. (Bell, viii).
So what do I do with this? At first glance, it sounds like what he claims to be toxic is the belief that not every person will be saved. One could conclude that Bell thinks the truth he mentions in the first sentence is, in fact, the “misguided” message.
Maybe I’m reading this from a Reformed standpoint, or maybe I’m just giving him the benefit of the doubt, but I’m not yet convinced Bell thinks God’s love will cover everyone. Read it again. Could he instead be saying that this truth (that an elect will be saved and others will be damned) has been given greater priority in evangelism than the message of Christ’s death for our sin? Look closely – his problem (that I know of at this point) is not with the message, it’s with the way it has been taught. To reject this message is to reject Jesus – this is his issue.
Here’s what I get from this: Christ’s death for me, personally, is bigger than my belief in it. It’s bigger than my wrestling match with understanding predestination, baptism, communion, etc. And any teaching that says that wrestling with these topics is the same as rejecting Christ, is toxic. In this, I have to agree. I know plenty of Christians who know Christ as their savior and struggle with understanding all kinds of theology. The one truth they hold onto is this: Christ died on my behalf.
I hope this is what Bell’s book is boiling down to, but based on all the hubbub out there, I’m guessing it isn’t. At this point I’m only in the preface, but for what it’s worth, kudos to Mr. Bell for starting the discussion. I look forward to peeling away the layers and discovering what he wants to say.
But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. – Philippians 1:18
Filed under: head